SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of SSD320 vs Neutron

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

SSD320
7.7
Neutron
8.8
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

SSD320
9.1
Neutron
7.7
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

SSD320
8.2
Neutron
8.5
Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

SSD320
7.5
Neutron
8.0
Passmark Disk Rating, PCMark Vantage, AS SSD Score and 1 more

SSDBoss Score

read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks

SSD320
7.7
Neutron
8.0

Winner
Corsair Neutron 

SSDBoss recommends the Corsair Neutron  based on its .

See full details

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Transcend SSD320

Reasons to consider the
Transcend SSD320

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 105.79 MB/s vs 62.27 MB/s Around 70% faster 4k random write
Significantly faster 512K sequential write 509.62 MB/s vs 353.2 MB/s Around 45% faster 512K sequential write
Significantly more capacity per dollar 1.6 GB/$ vs 0.42 GB/$ More than 3.8x more capacity per dollar
Lower 4k random write access time 2.36 ms vs 4.01 ms More than 40% lower 4k random write access time
Slightly higher PCMark vantage score 25,364 pts vs 23,717 pts More than 5% higher PCMark vantage score
Front view of Corsair Neutron

Reasons to consider the
Corsair Neutron

Report a correction
Significantly faster 4k random read 215.37 MB/s vs 111.07 MB/s Around 95% faster 4k random read
Faster windows 7 boot-up time 8.5 s vs 9.9 s Around 15% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Higher AS SSD score 1,046 pts vs 841 pts Around 25% higher AS SSD score
Higher passmark rating 3,438 pts vs 2,483 pts Around 40% higher passmark rating
Lower 4k random read access time 1.16 ms vs 2.25 ms Around 50% lower 4k random read access time
Faster tom's storage bench application 565 pts vs 474 pts Around 20% faster tom's storage bench application
Lower avg. power consumption 2.6 Watts vs 3.03 Watts Around 15% lower avg. power consumption
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 393.78 MB/s vs 314.69 MB/s More than 25% faster AS SSD ISO copy

Benchmarks Real world tests of SSD320 vs Neutron

4K Random Read

SSD320
111.07 MB/s
Neutron
215.37 MB/s

4K Random Write

SSD320
105.79 MB/s
Neutron
62.27 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

SSD320
9.9 s
Neutron
8.5 s

Avg. Power Consumption

SSD320
3.03 Watts
Neutron
2.6 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

SSD320
2.36 ms
Neutron
4.01 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

SSD320
2.25 ms
Neutron
1.16 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus