SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Q300 vs Q Pro

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Toshiba Q300

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q300

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 960 GB vs 128 GB 7.5x higher capacity
Faster photoshop lens filter 53.8 s vs 56.2 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Front view of Toshiba Q Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q Pro

Report a correction
Much faster 512K sequential write 477.28 MB/s vs 117.28 MB/s More than 4x faster 512K sequential write
Faster 4k random write 90.19 MB/s vs 42.14 MB/s Around 2.2x faster 4k random write
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 26,344 pts vs 18,540 pts More than 40% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster 512K sequential read 528.11 MB/s vs 363.7 MB/s More than 45% faster 512K sequential read
Much lower 4k random write access time 2.77 ms vs 5.93 ms 2.1x lower 4k random write access time
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 462.34 MB/s vs 386.13 MB/s Around 20% faster AS SSD ISO copy

Benchmarks Real world tests of Toshiba Q300 vs Q Pro

4K Random Read

Toshiba Q300
199.51 MB/s
Q Pro
228.53 MB/s

4K Random Write

Toshiba Q300
42.14 MB/s
Q Pro
90.19 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Toshiba Q300
2.3 Watts
Q Pro
2.31 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Toshiba Q300
5.93 ms
Q Pro
2.77 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Toshiba Q300
1.25 ms
Q Pro
1.09 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus