Toshiba Q300 vs OCZ Trion 150 |
VS
Released February, 2016
OCZ Trion 150
- 960 GB
- 2.5" SATA III
- 24 MB
by techPowerUp!For a mom-and-pop office and Internet computer, the Trion 150 is a great option, though, as it will definitely provide the amazing HDD-to-SSD upgrade experience at an extremely competitive price point.
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Toshiba Q300 vs the OCZ Trion 150. | |||||||
| |||||||
| SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the OCZ Trion 150 vs the Toshiba Q300. | |||||||
Report a correction
Specifications Full list of technical specs
storage | Toshiba Q300 | vs | Trion 150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 960 GB | 960 GB | |
| Interface | SATA III | SATA III | |
| Interface speed | 6 Gbit/s | 6 Gbit/s | |
manufacturer performance | |||
| MTBF | 1,500,000 hours | 1,500,000 hours | |
form factor | Toshiba Q300 | vs | Trion 150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form factor | 2.5" | 2.5" | |
| Weight | 48 g | 48 g |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| Toshiba OCZ TL100 vs OCZ Trion 150 | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Samsung SSD 850 EVO vs OCZ Trion 150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| OCZ Trion 100 vs 150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Samsung 840 EVO vs OCZ Trion 150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| Crucial MX300 vs OCZ Trion 150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| Toshiba A100 vs Q300 | ||
| | VS | |
| Samsung SSD 850 EVO vs Toshiba Q300 | ||
