SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Q300 Pro vs Q Pro

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
Q Pro
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
Q Pro
6.7
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Q300 Pro
8.2
Q Pro
8.0
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Q300 Pro
6.8
Q Pro
6.6
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Toshiba Q300 Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q300 Pro

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 341.42 MB/s vs 228.53 MB/s Around 50% faster 4k random read
Higher PCMark vantage score 30,229 pts vs 26,344 pts Around 15% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster photoshop lens filter 53.6 s vs 56.2 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random read access time 0.73 ms vs 1.09 ms Around 35% lower 4k random read access time
Front view of Toshiba Q Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q Pro

Report a correction
Slightly lighter 49 g vs 53 g Around 10% lighter

Benchmarks Real world tests of Q300 Pro vs Q Pro

4K Random Read

Q300 Pro
341.42 MB/s
Q Pro
228.53 MB/s

4K Random Write

Q300 Pro
90.61 MB/s
Q Pro
90.19 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Q300 Pro
2.23 Watts
Q Pro
2.31 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Q300 Pro
2.76 ms
Q Pro
2.77 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Q300 Pro
0.73 ms
Q Pro
1.09 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus