SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Q300 Pro vs HK3R2

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
HK3R2
6.8
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
HK3R2
6.9
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Q300 Pro
8.2
HK3R2
8.1
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Q300 Pro
6.8
HK3R2
6.9
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Toshiba Q300 Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q300 Pro

Report a correction
Lower avg. power consumption 2.23 Watts vs 2.53 Watts More than 10% lower avg. power consumption
Default view of Toshiba HK3R2

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba HK3R2

Report a correction
Higher capacity 240 GB vs 128 GB Around 90% higher capacity
Faster 4k random write 110.64 MB/s vs 90.61 MB/s More than 20% faster 4k random write
Higher MTBF 2,000,000 hours vs 1,500,000 hours Around 35% higher MTBF
Lower 4k random write access time 2.26 ms vs 2.76 ms Around 20% lower 4k random write access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of Q300 Pro vs HK3R2

4K Random Read

Q300 Pro
341.42 MB/s
HK3R2
358.9 MB/s

4K Random Write

Q300 Pro
90.61 MB/s
HK3R2
110.64 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Q300 Pro
2.23 Watts
HK3R2
2.53 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Q300 Pro
2.76 ms
HK3R2
2.26 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Q300 Pro
0.73 ms
HK3R2
0.7 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus