SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Q300 Pro vs Extreme PRO SSD

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Toshiba Q300 Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q300 Pro

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 341.42 MB/s vs 233.53 MB/s More than 45% faster 4k random read
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,229 pts vs 21,680 pts Around 40% higher PCMark vantage score
Much faster photoshop lens filter 53.6 s vs 63.8 s More than 15% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random read access time 0.73 ms vs 1.07 ms More than 30% lower 4k random read access time
Slightly faster AS SSD ISO copy 496.99 MB/s vs 432.06 MB/s More than 15% faster AS SSD ISO copy
Front view of SanDisk Extreme PRO SSD

Reasons to consider the
SanDisk Extreme PRO SSD

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 960 GB vs 128 GB 7.5x higher capacity

Benchmarks Real world tests of Q300 Pro vs Extreme PRO SSD

4K Random Read

Q300 Pro
341.42 MB/s
Extreme PRO SSD
233.53 MB/s

4K Random Write

Q300 Pro
90.61 MB/s
Extreme PRO SSD
90.93 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Q300 Pro
2.23 Watts
Extreme PRO SSD
2.34 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Q300 Pro
2.76 ms
Extreme PRO SSD
2.75 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Q300 Pro
0.73 ms
Extreme PRO SSD
1.07 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus