SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Q300 Pro vs 840 EVO

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
840 EVO
6.6
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
840 EVO
6.9
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Q300 Pro
8.2
840 EVO
7.9
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Q300 Pro
6.8
840 EVO
6.7
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Toshiba Q300 Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q300 Pro

Report a correction
Higher PCMark vantage score 30,229 pts vs 25,582 pts Around 20% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster photoshop lens filter 53.6 s vs 56.6 s More than 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Sibling view of Samsung 840 EVO

Reasons to consider the
Samsung 840 EVO

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 1,000 GB vs 128 GB More than 7.8x higher capacity
Faster 4k random write 106.65 MB/s vs 90.61 MB/s Around 20% faster 4k random write
Higher AS SSD score 1,198 pts vs 1,033 pts More than 15% higher AS SSD score
Slightly lower 4k random write access time 2.34 ms vs 2.76 ms More than 15% lower 4k random write access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of Q300 Pro vs 840 EVO

4K Random Read

Q300 Pro
341.42 MB/s
840 EVO
318.8 MB/s

4K Random Write

Q300 Pro
90.61 MB/s
840 EVO
106.65 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Q300 Pro
2.23 Watts
840 EVO
2.29 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Q300 Pro
2.76 ms
840 EVO
2.34 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Q300 Pro
0.73 ms
840 EVO
0.78 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus