SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Q300 Pro vs MX300

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
MX300
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Q300 Pro
6.7
MX300
6.3
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Q300 Pro
8.2
MX300
8.2
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Q300 Pro
6.8
MX300
6.9
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Toshiba Q300 Pro

Reasons to consider the
Toshiba Q300 Pro

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 90.61 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s More than 2x faster 4k random write
Faster 4k random read 341.42 MB/s vs 244.23 MB/s Around 40% faster 4k random read
Significantly lower 4k random write access time 2.76 ms vs 5.56 ms 2x lower 4k random write access time
Lower 4k random read access time 0.73 ms vs 1.02 ms Around 30% lower 4k random read access time
Slightly faster AS SSD ISO copy 496.99 MB/s vs 437.34 MB/s Around 15% faster AS SSD ISO copy
Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 750 GB vs 128 GB More than 5.8x higher capacity
Lower avg. power consumption 1.92 Watts vs 2.23 Watts Around 15% lower avg. power consumption
Faster photoshop lens filter 51.6 s vs 53.6 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter

Benchmarks Real world tests of Q300 Pro vs MX300

4K Random Read

Q300 Pro
341.42 MB/s
MX300
244.23 MB/s

4K Random Write

Q300 Pro
90.61 MB/s
MX300
44.94 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Q300 Pro
2.23 Watts
MX300
1.92 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Q300 Pro
2.76 ms
MX300
5.56 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Q300 Pro
0.73 ms
MX300
1.02 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus