Winner
Toshiba HK3R2
SSDBoss recommends the Toshiba HK3R2 based on its read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and benchmarks.
See full details | Toshiba HK3R2 vs Kingston HyperX FURY |
by PCMag (Jun, 2014)The Seagate 600 Pro's additional over-provisioning may still be worth investing in if you have an exceptionally heavy write workload in a product like MySQL, but it's generally overmatched in terms of raw performance.
by Kristian-Vättö (Jun, 2014)Desktop capacities will be limited to 8GB at launch while server DIMMs will be available in 16GB as well.
read performance | |
How quickly data is read from the drive | |
HK3R2 6.8 HyperX FURY 5.3 | |
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read |
write performance | |
How quickly data is written to the drive | |
HK3R2 6.9 HyperX FURY 6.3 | |
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write |
real world benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs common tasks | |
HK3R2 8.1 HyperX FURY 7.3 | |
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy |
Benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs on common benchmarks | |
HK3R2 6.9 HyperX FURY 6.1 | |
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score |
SSDBoss Score | |
read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks | |
HK3R2 7.0 HyperX FURY 6.1 |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much faster 4k random read | 358.9 MB/s | vs | 30.99 MB/s | More than 11.5x faster 4k random read | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly faster 4k random write | 110.64 MB/s | vs | 32.88 MB/s | More than 3.2x faster 4k random write | |||
Much lower 4k random read access time | 0.7 ms | vs | 8.07 ms | 11.5x lower 4k random read access time | |||
Faster 512K sequential read | 526.34 MB/s | vs | 260.03 MB/s | More than 2x faster 512K sequential read | |||
Higher capacity | 240 GB | vs | 120 GB | 2x higher capacity | |||
Much lower 4k random write access time | 2.26 ms | vs | 7.6 ms | 3.4x lower 4k random write access time | |||
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score | 30,707 pts | vs | 21,542 pts | Around 45% higher PCMark vantage score | |||
Significantly higher AS SSD score | 1,139 pts | vs | 368 pts | More than 3x higher AS SSD score | |||
Much faster photoshop lens filter | 53.9 s | vs | 63.2 s | Around 15% faster photoshop lens filter | |||
Much higher MTBF | 2,000,000 hours | vs | 1,000,000 hours | 2x higher MTBF | |||
Lighter | 60 g | vs | 91 g | Around 35% lighter | |||
Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy | 496.87 MB/s | vs | 162.03 MB/s | More than 3x faster AS SSD ISO copy | |||
| |||||||
SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Kingston HyperX FURY vs the Toshiba HK3R2. | |||||||