Winner
Toshiba HK3R2
SSDBoss recommends the Toshiba HK3R2 based on its read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and benchmarks.
See full details Toshiba HK3R2 vs Kingston HyperX FURY |
Released February, 2015
Toshiba HK3R2
- 240 GB
- 2.5" SATA III
7 Out of 10
by PCMag (Jun, 2014)The Seagate 600 Pro's additional over-provisioning may still be worth investing in if you have an exceptionally heavy write workload in a product like MySQL, but it's generally overmatched in terms of raw performance.
VS
Released June, 2014
Kingston HyperX FURY
- 120 GB
- 2.5" SATA III
6.1 Out of 10
by Kristian-Vättö (Jun, 2014)Desktop capacities will be limited to 8GB at launch while server DIMMs will be available in 16GB as well.
SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of HK3R2 vs HyperX FURY
read performance | |
How quickly data is read from the drive | |
| 4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read | |
write performance | |
How quickly data is written to the drive | |
| 4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write | |
real world benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs common tasks | |
| Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy | |
Benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs on common benchmarks | |
| PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score | |
SSDBoss Score | |
read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks | |
 | Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much faster 4k random read | 358.9 MB/s | vs | 30.99 MB/s | More than 11.5x faster 4k random read | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly faster 4k random write | 110.64 MB/s | vs | 32.88 MB/s | More than 3.2x faster 4k random write | |||
| Much lower 4k random read access time | 0.7 ms | vs | 8.07 ms | 11.5x lower 4k random read access time | |||
| Faster 512K sequential read | 526.34 MB/s | vs | 260.03 MB/s | More than 2x faster 512K sequential read | |||
| Higher capacity | 240 GB | vs | 120 GB | 2x higher capacity | |||
| Much lower 4k random write access time | 2.26 ms | vs | 7.6 ms | 3.4x lower 4k random write access time | |||
| Significantly higher PCMark vantage score | 30,707 pts | vs | 21,542 pts | Around 45% higher PCMark vantage score | |||
| Significantly higher AS SSD score | 1,139 pts | vs | 368 pts | More than 3x higher AS SSD score | |||
| Much faster photoshop lens filter | 53.9 s | vs | 63.2 s | Around 15% faster photoshop lens filter | |||
| Much higher MTBF | 2,000,000 hours | vs | 1,000,000 hours | 2x higher MTBF | |||
| Lighter | 60 g | vs | 91 g | Around 35% lighter | |||
| Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy | 496.87 MB/s | vs | 162.03 MB/s | More than 3x faster AS SSD ISO copy | |||
| |||||||
| SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Kingston HyperX FURY vs the Toshiba HK3R2. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of HK3R2 vs HyperX FURY
4K Random Read
4K Random Write
Avg. Power Consumption
4K Random Read Access Time
4K Random Write Access Time
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $45 | $43 | |
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs SSDNow V300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $45 | ||
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs Savage SSD | ||
| | VS |  |
| $45 | $256 | |
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs 3K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $45 | ||
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs Samsung 840 EVO | ||
| | VS |  |
| $45 | ||
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs SSDNow UV400 | ||
| | VS | |
| $45 | ||
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs Samsung SSD 850 EVO | ||
| | VS |  |
| $45 | $63 | |
| Kingston HyperX FURY vs SanDisk SSD Plus | ||
