SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Extreme PRO SSD vs 730

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

SSDBoss Score

read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks

Winner
Intel 730 

SSDBoss recommends the Intel 730  based on its read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and benchmarks.

See full details

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of SanDisk Extreme PRO SSD

Reasons to consider the
SanDisk Extreme PRO SSD

Report a correction
Significantly higher capacity 960 GB vs 480 GB 2x higher capacity
More capacity per dollar 2.53 GB/$ vs 1.85 GB/$ More than 35% more capacity per dollar
Front view of Intel 730

Reasons to consider the
Intel 730

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 150.79 MB/s vs 90.93 MB/s More than 65% faster 4k random write
Faster 4k random read 326.62 MB/s vs 233.53 MB/s Around 40% faster 4k random read
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,253 pts vs 21,680 pts Around 40% higher PCMark vantage score
Much faster photoshop lens filter 53.6 s vs 63.8 s More than 15% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random write access time 1.66 ms vs 2.75 ms Around 40% lower 4k random write access time
Lower 4k random read access time 0.76 ms vs 1.07 ms Around 30% lower 4k random read access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of Extreme PRO SSD vs Intel 730

4K Random Read

Extreme PRO SSD
233.53 MB/s
Intel 730
326.62 MB/s

4K Random Write

Extreme PRO SSD
90.93 MB/s
Intel 730
150.79 MB/s

4K Random Read Access Time

Extreme PRO SSD
2.75 ms
Intel 730
1.66 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Extreme PRO SSD
1.07 ms
Intel 730
0.76 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus