SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Extreme PRO SSD vs MX200

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of SanDisk Extreme PRO SSD

Reasons to consider the
SanDisk Extreme PRO SSD

Report a correction
Significantly higher capacity 960 GB vs 500 GB More than 90% higher capacity
Faster 4k random read 233.53 MB/s vs 169.96 MB/s More than 35% faster 4k random read
Faster 4k random write 90.93 MB/s vs 71.58 MB/s More than 25% faster 4k random write
Lower 4k random write access time 2.75 ms vs 3.49 ms More than 20% lower 4k random write access time
Lower 4k random read access time 1.07 ms vs 1.47 ms More than 25% lower 4k random read access time
Front view of Crucial MX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX200

Report a correction
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,457 pts vs 21,680 pts More than 40% higher PCMark vantage score
Much faster photoshop lens filter 53.9 s vs 63.8 s More than 15% faster photoshop lens filter
More capacity per dollar 3.33 GB/$ vs 2.53 GB/$ More than 30% more capacity per dollar
Lower avg. power consumption 2.03 Watts vs 2.34 Watts Around 15% lower avg. power consumption

Benchmarks Real world tests of Extreme PRO SSD vs MX200

4K Random Read

Extreme PRO SSD
233.53 MB/s
MX200
169.96 MB/s

4K Random Write

Extreme PRO SSD
90.93 MB/s
MX200
71.58 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Extreme PRO SSD
2.34 Watts
MX200
2.03 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Extreme PRO SSD
2.75 ms
MX200
3.49 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Extreme PRO SSD
1.07 ms
MX200
1.47 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus