SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 840 EVO vs HyperX FURY

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Sibling view of Samsung 840 EVO

Reasons to consider the
Samsung 840 EVO

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 1,000 GB vs 120 GB More than 8.2x higher capacity
Much faster 4k random read 318.8 MB/s vs 30.99 MB/s More than 10.2x faster 4k random read
Significantly faster 4k random write 106.65 MB/s vs 32.88 MB/s Around 3.2x faster 4k random write
Much lower 4k random read access time 0.78 ms vs 8.07 ms 10.3x lower 4k random read access time
Faster 512K sequential read 527.52 MB/s vs 260.03 MB/s More than 2x faster 512K sequential read
Much lower 4k random write access time 2.34 ms vs 7.6 ms 3.2x lower 4k random write access time
Significantly higher AS SSD score 1,198 pts vs 368 pts More than 3.2x higher AS SSD score
Faster windows 7 boot-up time 9.3 s vs 10.8 s Around 15% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Lighter 53 g vs 91 g More than 40% lighter
Higher PCMark vantage score 25,582 pts vs 21,542 pts Around 20% higher PCMark vantage score
Significantly faster photoshop lens filter 56.6 s vs 63.2 s More than 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy 441.16 MB/s vs 162.03 MB/s Around 2.8x faster AS SSD ISO copy
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,000,000 hours 50% higher MTBF
Lower avg. power consumption 2.29 Watts vs 2.54 Watts Around 10% lower avg. power consumption
Front view of Kingston HyperX FURY

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX FURY

Report a correction

SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Kingston HyperX FURY vs the Samsung 840 EVO.

Benchmarks Real world tests of 840 EVO vs HyperX FURY

4K Random Read

840 EVO
318.8 MB/s
HyperX FURY
30.99 MB/s

4K Random Write

840 EVO
106.65 MB/s
HyperX FURY
32.88 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

840 EVO
9.3 s
HyperX FURY
10.8 s

Avg. Power Consumption

840 EVO
2.29 Watts
HyperX FURY
2.54 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

840 EVO
2.34 ms
HyperX FURY
7.6 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

840 EVO
0.78 ms
HyperX FURY
8.07 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus