SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 840 EVO vs 335

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

840 EVO
6.6
Intel 335
5.8
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

840 EVO
6.9
Intel 335
7.0
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

840 EVO
7.9
Intel 335
7.9
Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

840 EVO
6.7
Intel 335
6.5
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Sibling view of Samsung 840 EVO

Reasons to consider the
Samsung 840 EVO

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 1,000 GB vs 180 GB More than 5.5x higher capacity
Much larger cache 1,000 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all SSDs, 1,000 MB cache is just OK
Significantly faster 4k random read 318.8 MB/s vs 107.08 MB/s Around 3x faster 4k random read
Significantly lower 4k random read access time 0.78 ms vs 2.34 ms 3x lower 4k random read access time
Higher AS SSD score 1,198 pts vs 787 pts More than 50% higher AS SSD score
Significantly lower avg. power consumption 2.29 Watts vs 2.95 Watts More than 20% lower avg. power consumption
Lighter 53 g vs 78 g More than 30% lighter
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,200,000 hours 25% higher MTBF
Thinner thickness 7 mm vs 10 mm More than 25% thinner thickness
Faster sequential write 520 MB/s vs 450 MB/s More than 15% faster sequential write
Front view of Intel 335

Reasons to consider the
Intel 335

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 124.08 MB/s vs 106.65 MB/s More than 15% faster 4k random write

Benchmarks Real world tests of 840 EVO vs Intel 335

4K Random Read

840 EVO
318.8 MB/s
Intel 335
107.08 MB/s

4K Random Write

840 EVO
106.65 MB/s
Intel 335
124.08 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

840 EVO
9.3 s
Intel 335
9.5 s

Avg. Power Consumption

840 EVO
2.29 Watts
Intel 335
2.95 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

840 EVO
2.34 ms
Intel 335
2.02 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

840 EVO
0.78 ms
Intel 335
2.34 ms

Reviews Word on the street

840 EVO  vs Intel 335 

9.0
8.0
The RAPID mode is designed specifically to help boost random performance and uses spare CPU power and system memory capacity (up to 1GB) to act as another layer of cache.
840 EVO

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus