SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 840 EVO vs M500

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Sibling view of Samsung 840 EVO

Reasons to consider the
Samsung 840 EVO

Report a correction
Much larger cache 1,000 MB vs 24 MB Around 41.8x larger cache
Significantly faster 4k random read 318.8 MB/s vs 126.46 MB/s More than 2.5x faster 4k random read
Faster 4k random write 106.65 MB/s vs 66.2 MB/s More than 60% faster 4k random write
Faster 512K sequential write 510.27 MB/s vs 413.32 MB/s Around 25% faster 512K sequential write
Significantly lower 4k random read access time 0.78 ms vs 1.98 ms 2.5x lower 4k random read access time
Lower 4k random write access time 2.34 ms vs 3.78 ms Around 40% lower 4k random write access time
Higher AS SSD score 1,198 pts vs 1,011 pts Around 20% higher AS SSD score
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,200,000 hours 25% higher MTBF
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 441.16 MB/s vs 306.5 MB/s Around 45% faster AS SSD ISO copy
Slightly lighter 53 g vs 64 g More than 15% lighter
Front view of Crucial M500

Reasons to consider the
Crucial M500

Report a correction
Lower avg. power consumption 2.13 Watts vs 2.29 Watts More than 5% lower avg. power consumption

Benchmarks Real world tests of 840 EVO vs Crucial M500

4K Random Read

840 EVO
318.8 MB/s
Crucial M500
126.46 MB/s

4K Random Write

840 EVO
106.65 MB/s
Crucial M500
66.2 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

840 EVO
9.3 s
Crucial M500
8.8 s

Avg. Power Consumption

840 EVO
2.29 Watts
Crucial M500
2.13 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

840 EVO
2.34 ms
Crucial M500
3.78 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

840 EVO
0.78 ms
Crucial M500
1.98 ms

Reviews Word on the street

840 EVO  vs Crucial M500 

9.0
9.0
The RAPID mode is designed specifically to help boost random performance and uses spare CPU power and system memory capacity (up to 1GB) to act as another layer of cache.
840 EVO

Read more

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
I hope you went with the 840 evo. Samsung has a software that can control the SSD and they have this Turbo mode and makes the SSD as fast as PCI SSD
I am currently looking between those two SSD Drives, but can't decide what's the best choice (MLC vs TLC). For more data security MLC would be better because of the higher amount of read/write actions each sector can handle, (2 bit vs 3 bit). But at the other hand, the EVO will last so long before you get bad sectors that even with high data transfers it will take years and years before you even lose files and so on. Hard too choose lol......
comments powered by Disqus