SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 840 EVO vs BX200

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

840 EVO
6.6
BX200
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

840 EVO
6.9
BX200
6.3
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

840 EVO
7.9
BX200
8.1
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

840 EVO
6.7
BX200
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Sibling view of Samsung 840 EVO

Reasons to consider the
Samsung 840 EVO

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 1,000 GB vs 240 GB Around 4.2x higher capacity
Much larger cache 1,000 MB vs 256 MB Around 4x larger cache
Faster 4k random read 318.8 MB/s vs 194.99 MB/s Around 65% faster 4k random read
Faster 4k random write 106.65 MB/s vs 63.61 MB/s Around 70% faster 4k random write
Faster 512K sequential write 510.27 MB/s vs 400.17 MB/s Around 30% faster 512K sequential write
Faster 512K sequential read 527.52 MB/s vs 363.24 MB/s More than 45% faster 512K sequential read
Lower 4k random write access time 2.34 ms vs 3.93 ms More than 40% lower 4k random write access time
Higher AS SSD score 1,198 pts vs 987 pts More than 20% higher AS SSD score
Lower 4k random read access time 0.78 ms vs 1.27 ms Around 40% lower 4k random read access time
Lower avg. power consumption 2.29 Watts vs 2.49 Watts Around 10% lower avg. power consumption
Front view of Crucial BX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX200

Report a correction
Higher PCMark vantage score 30,018 pts vs 25,582 pts More than 15% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster photoshop lens filter 54.2 s vs 56.6 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter

Benchmarks Real world tests of 840 EVO vs BX200

4K Random Read

840 EVO
318.8 MB/s
BX200
194.99 MB/s

4K Random Write

840 EVO
106.65 MB/s
BX200
63.61 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

840 EVO
2.29 Watts
BX200
2.49 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

840 EVO
2.34 ms
BX200
3.93 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

840 EVO
0.78 ms
BX200
1.27 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus