SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 830 vs IBIS HSDL

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung 830

Reasons to consider the
Samsung 830

Report a correction
Much lighter 61 g vs 339 g 5.6x lighter
Much lower avg. power consumption 2.19 Watts vs 7.84 Watts 3.6x lower avg. power consumption
Much faster windows 7 boot-up time 10.5 s vs 16.6 s More than 35% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Significantly larger cache 256 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all SSDs, 256 MB cache is just OK
Much faster photoshop lens filter 55.2 s vs 74 s More than 25% faster photoshop lens filter
Much thinner thickness 7 mm vs 25 mm 3.6x thinner thickness
Default view of OCZ IBIS HSDL

Reasons to consider the
OCZ IBIS HSDL

Report a correction
Much faster 4k random write 218.13 MB/s vs 44.96 MB/s More than 4.8x faster 4k random write
Much faster 512K sequential write 510.91 MB/s vs 147.78 MB/s Around 3.5x faster 512K sequential write
Higher capacity 160 GB vs 64 GB 2.5x higher capacity
Much lower 4k random write access time 1.15 ms vs 5.56 ms 4.8x lower 4k random write access time
Faster 512K sequential read 710.98 MB/s vs 521.05 MB/s More than 35% faster 512K sequential read
Higher AS SSD score 1,220 pts vs 641 pts More than 90% higher AS SSD score
Slightly faster 4k random read 257.14 MB/s vs 225.52 MB/s Around 15% faster 4k random read
Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy 532.98 MB/s vs 195.14 MB/s Around 2.8x faster AS SSD ISO copy
Higher MTBF 2,000,000 hours vs 1,500,000 hours Around 35% higher MTBF

Benchmarks Real world tests of Samsung 830 vs IBIS HSDL

4K Random Read

Samsung 830
225.52 MB/s
IBIS HSDL
257.14 MB/s

4K Random Write

Samsung 830
44.96 MB/s
IBIS HSDL
218.13 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

Samsung 830
10.5 s
IBIS HSDL
16.6 s

Avg. Power Consumption

Samsung 830
2.19 Watts
IBIS HSDL
7.84 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Samsung 830
5.56 ms
IBIS HSDL
1.15 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Samsung 830
1.11 ms
IBIS HSDL
0.97 ms

Reviews Word on the street

Samsung 830  vs IBIS HSDL 

8.5
8.0
Controller speed has been improved, and the SATA interface upgraded to the 6GB/s SATA 3.0.
Samsung 830

Comments

comments powered by Disqus