SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of PX-M5P vs MX300

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

PX-M5P
6.3
MX300
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

PX-M5P
6.6
MX300
6.3
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

PX-M5P
7.7
MX300
8.2
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PX-M5P
6.6
MX300
6.9
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Plextor PX-M5P

Reasons to consider the
Plextor PX-M5P

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 100.38 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s Around 2.2x faster 4k random write
Much lower 4k random write access time 2.49 ms vs 5.56 ms 2.2x lower 4k random write access time
Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Higher capacity 750 GB vs 512 GB More than 45% higher capacity
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,438 pts vs 23,353 pts More than 30% higher PCMark vantage score
Significantly lower avg. power consumption 1.92 Watts vs 2.71 Watts Around 30% lower avg. power consumption
Faster 512K sequential write 477.46 MB/s vs 423.12 MB/s Around 15% faster 512K sequential write
Faster photoshop lens filter 51.6 s vs 56.1 s Around 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 437.34 MB/s vs 287.61 MB/s More than 50% faster AS SSD ISO copy

Benchmarks Real world tests of PX-M5P vs MX300

4K Random Read

PX-M5P
240.51 MB/s
MX300
244.23 MB/s

4K Random Write

PX-M5P
100.38 MB/s
MX300
44.94 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

PX-M5P
2.71 Watts
MX300
1.92 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

PX-M5P
2.49 ms
MX300
5.56 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

PX-M5P
1.04 ms
MX300
1.02 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus