Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of OCZ Vector

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Vector

Report a correction
Much larger cache 1,024 MB vs 24 MB Around 42.8x larger cache
Front view of OCZ Trion 150

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Trion 150

Report a correction
Significantly higher capacity 960 GB vs 512 GB Around 90% higher capacity
Significantly lighter 48 g vs 115 g 2.4x lighter
Much more capacity per dollar 4.27 GB/$ vs 0.93 GB/$ More than 4.5x more capacity per dollar
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,300,000 hours More than 15% higher MTBF

Reviews Word on the street

Vector  vs Trion 150 

9.3
8.9
While single-thread random performance is only in the middle of our test group, we see very nice performance at multi-threaded reads.
Vector

Specifications Full list of technical specs

storage

Vector  vs
Trion 150 
Capacity 512 GB 960 GB
Cache 1,024 MB 24 MB
Interface SATA III SATA III
Interface speed 6 Gbit/s 6 Gbit/s

manufacturer performance

MTBF 1,300,000 hours 1,500,000 hours

form factor

Vector  vs
Trion 150 
Form factor 2.5" 2.5"
Thickness 7 mm 7 mm
Weight 115 g 48 g

Comments

comments powered by Disqus