SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Vector vs IBIS HSDL

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Vector
6.9
IBIS HSDL
6.5
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Vector
6.5
IBIS HSDL
7.7
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Vector
7.8
IBIS HSDL
7.2
Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Vector
6.7
IBIS HSDL
6.7
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of OCZ Vector

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Vector

Report a correction
Much larger cache 1,024 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all SSDs, 1,024 MB cache is just OK
Much faster windows 7 boot-up time 10 s vs 16.6 s Around 40% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Higher capacity 512 GB vs 160 GB Around 3.2x higher capacity
Much lighter 115 g vs 339 g 2.9x lighter
Faster 4k random read 380.71 MB/s vs 257.14 MB/s Around 50% faster 4k random read
Much faster photoshop lens filter 56 s vs 74 s Around 25% faster photoshop lens filter
Much thinner thickness 7 mm vs 25 mm 3.6x thinner thickness
Lower 4k random read access time 0.66 ms vs 0.97 ms More than 30% lower 4k random read access time
Default view of OCZ IBIS HSDL

Reasons to consider the
OCZ IBIS HSDL

Report a correction
Much faster 4k random write 218.13 MB/s vs 100.6 MB/s Around 2.2x faster 4k random write
Faster 512K sequential write 510.91 MB/s vs 382.44 MB/s Around 35% faster 512K sequential write
Faster 512K sequential read 710.98 MB/s vs 531.4 MB/s Around 35% faster 512K sequential read
Significantly higher MTBF 2,000,000 hours vs 1,300,000 hours Around 55% higher MTBF
Lower 4k random write access time 1.15 ms vs 2.48 ms 2.2x lower 4k random write access time
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 532.98 MB/s vs 393.78 MB/s More than 35% faster AS SSD ISO copy
Significantly faster power consumption (Idle) 6.6 Watts vs 0.9 Watts More than 7.2x faster power consumption (Idle)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Vector vs IBIS HSDL

4K Random Read

Vector
380.71 MB/s
IBIS HSDL
257.14 MB/s

4K Random Write

Vector
100.6 MB/s
IBIS HSDL
218.13 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

Vector
10 s
IBIS HSDL
16.6 s

Avg. Power Consumption

Vector
2.4 Watts
IBIS HSDL
7.84 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Vector
2.48 ms
IBIS HSDL
1.15 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Vector
0.66 ms
IBIS HSDL
0.97 ms

Reviews Word on the street

Vector  vs IBIS HSDL 

8.5
8.0
If that seem incremental, going on insignificant, bear in mind that numbers above 500MB/s for peak throughput are hammering up against the maximum capabilities of the SATA6Gbps interface.
Vector

Comments

comments powered by Disqus