SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Vector vs MX300

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Vector
6.9
MX300
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Vector
6.5
MX300
6.3
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Vector
7.9
MX300
8.2
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Vector
6.7
MX300
6.9
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of OCZ Vector

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Vector

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 380.71 MB/s vs 244.23 MB/s More than 55% faster 4k random read
Faster 4k random write 100.6 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s Around 2.2x faster 4k random write
Much lower 4k random write access time 2.48 ms vs 5.56 ms 2.2x lower 4k random write access time
Lower 4k random read access time 0.66 ms vs 1.02 ms More than 35% lower 4k random read access time
Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Higher capacity 750 GB vs 512 GB More than 45% higher capacity
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,438 pts vs 24,230 pts More than 25% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster 512K sequential write 477.46 MB/s vs 382.44 MB/s Around 25% faster 512K sequential write
Lower avg. power consumption 1.92 Watts vs 2.4 Watts 20% lower avg. power consumption
Faster photoshop lens filter 51.6 s vs 56 s Around 10% faster photoshop lens filter

Benchmarks Real world tests of Vector vs MX300

4K Random Read

Vector
380.71 MB/s
MX300
244.23 MB/s

4K Random Write

Vector
100.6 MB/s
MX300
44.94 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Vector
2.4 Watts
MX300
1.92 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Vector
2.48 ms
MX300
5.56 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Vector
0.66 ms
MX300
1.02 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus