SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of Vector vs BX200

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

Vector
6.9
BX200
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

Vector
6.5
BX200
6.3
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Vector
7.9
BX200
8.1
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Vector
6.7
BX200
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

SSDBoss Score

read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks

Vector
6.8
BX200
6.7

Winner
OCZ Vector 

SSDBoss recommends the OCZ Vector  based on its read performance and write performance.

See full details

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of OCZ Vector

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Vector

Report a correction
Much larger cache 1,024 MB vs 256 MB 4x larger cache
Significantly faster 4k random read 380.71 MB/s vs 194.99 MB/s More than 95% faster 4k random read
Higher capacity 512 GB vs 240 GB Around 2.2x higher capacity
Faster 4k random write 100.6 MB/s vs 63.61 MB/s Around 60% faster 4k random write
Faster 512K sequential read 531.4 MB/s vs 363.24 MB/s More than 45% faster 512K sequential read
Lower 4k random write access time 2.48 ms vs 3.93 ms More than 35% lower 4k random write access time
Higher AS SSD score 1,178 pts vs 987 pts Around 20% higher AS SSD score
Lower 4k random read access time 0.66 ms vs 1.27 ms Around 50% lower 4k random read access time
Front view of Crucial BX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX200

Report a correction
Higher PCMark vantage score 30,018 pts vs 24,230 pts Around 25% higher PCMark vantage score
Much more capacity per dollar 3.43 GB/$ vs 0.93 GB/$ Around 3.8x more capacity per dollar
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 493.17 MB/s vs 393.78 MB/s More than 25% faster AS SSD ISO copy
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,300,000 hours More than 15% higher MTBF
Faster photoshop lens filter 54.2 s vs 56 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter

Benchmarks Real world tests of Vector vs BX200

4K Random Read

Vector
380.71 MB/s
BX200
194.99 MB/s

4K Random Write

Vector
100.6 MB/s
BX200
63.61 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

Vector
2.4 Watts
BX200
2.49 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Vector
2.48 ms
BX200
3.93 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Vector
0.66 ms
BX200
1.27 ms

Reviews Word on the street

Vector  vs BX200 

9.3
8.9
While single-thread random performance is only in the middle of our test group, we see very nice performance at multi-threaded reads.
Vector

Comments

comments powered by Disqus