Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of OCZ Vector 180

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Vector 180

Report a correction
Significantly higher MTBF 2,300,000 hours vs 1,500,000 hours Around 55% higher MTBF
Front view of OCZ Trion 150

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Trion 150

Report a correction
Significantly lighter 48 g vs 115 g 2.4x lighter

Reviews Word on the street

Vector 180  vs Trion 150 

8.0
8.9
We used the performance data from all our real-life benchmarks and condensed the results into a single relative performance score.
Trion 150

Specifications Full list of technical specs

storage

Vector 180  vs
Trion 150 
Capacity 960 GB 960 GB
Interface SATA III SATA III
Interface speed 6 Gbit/s 6 Gbit/s

manufacturer performance

MTBF 2,300,000 hours 1,500,000 hours

form factor

Vector 180  vs
Trion 150 
Form factor 2.5" 2.5"
Weight 115 g 48 g

Comments

comments powered by Disqus