Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of OCZ Trion 150

Reasons to consider the
OCZ Trion 150

Report a correction
Much higher capacity 960 GB vs 240 GB 4x higher capacity
More capacity per dollar 4.27 GB/$ vs 3.43 GB/$ Around 25% more capacity per dollar
Front view of Crucial BX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX200

Report a correction
Larger cache 256 MB vs 24 MB Around 10.8x larger cache

Reviews Word on the street

Trion 150  vs BX200 

8.9
8.9
We used the performance data from all our real-life benchmarks and condensed the results into a single relative performance score.
Trion 150

Specifications Full list of technical specs

storage

Trion 150  vs
BX200 
Capacity 960 GB 240 GB
Cache 24 MB 256 MB
Interface SATA III SATA III
Interface speed 6 Gbit/s 6 Gbit/s

manufacturer performance

MTBF 1,500,000 hours 1,500,000 hours

form factor

Trion 150  vs
BX200 
Form factor 2.5" 2.5"
Thickness 7 mm 7 mm

Comments

comments powered by Disqus