SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of RevoDrive X2 vs HyperX Savage SSD

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of OCZ RevoDrive X2

Reasons to consider the
OCZ RevoDrive X2

Report a correction
Much faster 4k random write 203.72 MB/s vs 58.47 MB/s Around 3.5x faster 4k random write
Faster 4k random read 251.97 MB/s vs 189.07 MB/s Around 35% faster 4k random read
Faster 512K sequential write 671.29 MB/s vs 514.74 MB/s More than 30% faster 512K sequential write
Much lower 4k random write access time 1.23 ms vs 4.28 ms 3.5x lower 4k random write access time
Much higher MTBF 2,000,000 hours vs 1,000,000 hours 2x higher MTBF
Faster 512K sequential read 658.53 MB/s vs 534.89 MB/s Around 25% faster 512K sequential read
Lower 4k random read access time 0.99 ms vs 1.32 ms More than 25% lower 4k random read access time
Default view of Kingston HyperX Savage SSD

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX Savage SSD

Report a correction
Much faster photoshop lens filter 53.8 s vs 72.8 s More than 25% faster photoshop lens filter
Lighter 92 g vs 130 g Around 30% lighter
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 422.85 MB/s vs 354.95 MB/s Around 20% faster AS SSD ISO copy

Benchmarks Real world tests of RevoDrive X2 vs HyperX Savage SSD

4K Random Read

RevoDrive X2
251.97 MB/s
HyperX Savage SSD
189.07 MB/s

4K Random Write

RevoDrive X2
203.72 MB/s
HyperX Savage SSD
58.47 MB/s

4K Random Read Access Time

4K Random Write Access Time

Comments

comments powered by Disqus