SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of IBIS HSDL vs HyperX

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

IBIS HSDL
6.5
HyperX
5.8
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

IBIS HSDL
7.7
HyperX
6.9
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

IBIS HSDL
7.2
HyperX
7.6
Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

IBIS HSDL
6.7
HyperX
6.4
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of OCZ IBIS HSDL

Reasons to consider the
OCZ IBIS HSDL

Report a correction
Much faster 4k random write 218.13 MB/s vs 114.33 MB/s More than 90% faster 4k random write
Faster 4k random read 257.14 MB/s vs 111.3 MB/s More than 2.2x faster 4k random read
Much thinner thickness 25 mm vs 70 mm 2.7x thinner thickness
Faster 512K sequential read 710.98 MB/s vs 528.06 MB/s Around 35% faster 512K sequential read
Much higher MTBF 2,000,000 hours vs 1,000,000 hours 2x higher MTBF
Higher AS SSD score 1,220 pts vs 728 pts Around 70% higher AS SSD score
Significantly lower 4k random read access time 0.97 ms vs 2.25 ms 2.3x lower 4k random read access time
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 532.98 MB/s vs 314.17 MB/s Around 70% faster AS SSD ISO copy
Lower 4k random write access time 1.15 ms vs 2.19 ms More than 45% lower 4k random write access time
Front view of Kingston HyperX

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX

Report a correction
Much lighter 81 g vs 339 g 4.2x lighter
Much lower avg. power consumption 2.74 Watts vs 7.84 Watts 2.9x lower avg. power consumption
Much faster windows 7 boot-up time 11.6 s vs 16.6 s More than 30% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Much faster photoshop lens filter 56 s vs 74 s Around 25% faster photoshop lens filter
Slightly higher capacity 240 GB vs 160 GB 50% higher capacity
Higher PCMark vantage score 25,549 pts vs 23,141 pts More than 10% higher PCMark vantage score

Benchmarks Real world tests of IBIS HSDL vs HyperX

4K Random Read

IBIS HSDL
257.14 MB/s
HyperX
111.3 MB/s

4K Random Write

IBIS HSDL
218.13 MB/s
HyperX
114.33 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

IBIS HSDL
16.6 s
HyperX
11.6 s

Avg. Power Consumption

IBIS HSDL
7.84 Watts
HyperX
2.74 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

IBIS HSDL
1.15 ms
HyperX
2.19 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

IBIS HSDL
0.97 ms
HyperX
2.25 ms

Reviews Word on the street

IBIS HSDL  vs HyperX 

8.0
9.0
It gave outstanding sequential read/write figures of 553MB/s and 516MB/s respectively in the ATTO benchmark, making it a little faster than OCZ's Vertex 3.
HyperX

Comments

comments powered by Disqus