OCZ IBIS HSDL vs Corsair Force F120 |
Released December, 2010
OCZ IBIS HSDL
- 160 GB
- 3.5" HSDL
- 0 MB
6.8 Out of 10
by Tech Radar (Jan, 2011)The IBIS is incredibly quick at shunting big files.
VS
SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of IBIS HSDL vs Force F120
read performance | |
How quickly data is read from the drive | |
| 4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read | |
write performance | |
How quickly data is written to the drive | |
| 4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write | |
real world benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs common tasks | |
| Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy | |
Benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs on common benchmarks | |
| PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much faster 4k random write | 218.13 MB/s | vs | 56.34 MB/s | More than 3.8x faster 4k random write | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly faster 4k random read | 257.14 MB/s | vs | 82.89 MB/s | More than 3x faster 4k random read | |||
| Significantly faster 512K sequential write | 510.91 MB/s | vs | 221.26 MB/s | More than 2.2x faster 512K sequential write | |||
| Significantly faster 512K sequential read | 710.98 MB/s | vs | 257.97 MB/s | More than 2.8x faster 512K sequential read | |||
| Faster windows 7 boot-up time | 16.6 s | vs | 19.2 s | Around 15% faster windows 7 boot-up time | |||
| Significantly higher AS SSD score | 1,220 pts | vs | 368 pts | More than 3.2x higher AS SSD score | |||
| Much lower 4k random read access time | 0.97 ms | vs | 3.02 ms | 3.1x lower 4k random read access time | |||
| Much lower 4k random write access time | 1.15 ms | vs | 4.44 ms | 3.9x lower 4k random write access time | |||
| Much higher MTBF | 2,000,000 hours | vs | 1,000,000 hours | 2x higher MTBF | |||
| Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy | 532.98 MB/s | vs | 108.06 MB/s | Around 5x faster AS SSD ISO copy | |||
| Higher PCMark vantage score | 23,141 pts | vs | 20,395 pts | Around 15% higher PCMark vantage score | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower avg. power consumption | 1.15 Watts | vs | 7.84 Watts | 6.8x lower avg. power consumption | |||
| Much lighter | 77 g | vs | 339 g | 4.4x lighter | |||
Report a correction
