SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of SSDNow V300 vs MX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX100
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX100
7.4
Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX100
6.3
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Kingston SSDNow V300

Reasons to consider the
Kingston SSDNow V300

Report a correction
Much faster windows 7 boot-up time 8.3 s vs 14 s More than 40% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 24,283 pts vs 16,976 pts Around 45% higher PCMark vantage score
Significantly faster photoshop lens filter 56.7 s vs 64.2 s More than 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower avg. power consumption 1.81 Watts vs 2.31 Watts More than 20% lower avg. power consumption
Front view of Crucial MX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX100

Report a correction
Significantly higher capacity 512 GB vs 60 GB More than 8.5x higher capacity
Much larger cache 512 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all SSDs, 512 MB cache is just OK
Faster 4k random read 175.64 MB/s vs 38.7 MB/s More than 4.5x faster 4k random read
Much lower 4k random read access time 1.42 ms vs 6.46 ms 4.5x lower 4k random read access time
Faster 4k random write 72.86 MB/s vs 33.3 MB/s Around 2.2x faster 4k random write
Faster 512K sequential read 450.03 MB/s vs 235.27 MB/s More than 90% faster 512K sequential read
Significantly higher AS SSD score 1,030 pts vs 306 pts More than 3.2x higher AS SSD score
Much lower 4k random write access time 3.43 ms vs 7.51 ms 2.2x lower 4k random write access time
Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy 435.88 MB/s vs 113.54 MB/s More than 3.8x faster AS SSD ISO copy
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,000,000 hours 50% higher MTBF
More capacity per dollar 2.38 GB/$ vs 1.41 GB/$ Around 70% more capacity per dollar
Lighter 63 g vs 77 g Around 20% lighter

Benchmarks Real world tests of SSDNow V300 vs MX100

4K Random Read

SSDNow V300
38.7 MB/s
MX100
175.64 MB/s

4K Random Write

SSDNow V300
33.3 MB/s
MX100
72.86 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

SSDNow V300
8.3 s
MX100
14 s

Avg. Power Consumption

SSDNow V300
1.81 Watts
MX100
2.31 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

SSDNow V300
7.51 ms
MX100
3.43 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

SSDNow V300
6.46 ms
MX100
1.42 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus