SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of HyperX Savage SSD vs MX300

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Kingston HyperX Savage SSD

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX Savage SSD

Report a correction
Higher capacity 960 GB vs 750 GB Around 30% higher capacity
Slightly faster 4k random write 58.47 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s More than 30% faster 4k random write
Lower 4k random write access time 4.28 ms vs 5.56 ms Around 25% lower 4k random write access time
Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 244.23 MB/s vs 189.07 MB/s Around 30% faster 4k random read
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,438 pts vs 24,116 pts More than 25% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster photoshop lens filter 51.6 s vs 53.8 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random read access time 1.02 ms vs 1.32 ms Around 25% lower 4k random read access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of HyperX Savage SSD vs MX300

4K Random Read

HyperX Savage SSD
189.07 MB/s
MX300
244.23 MB/s

4K Random Write

HyperX Savage SSD
58.47 MB/s
MX300
44.94 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

HyperX Savage SSD
1.85 Watts
MX300
1.92 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX300
5.56 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX300
1.02 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus