SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of HyperX FURY vs HyperX 3K

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive
HyperX FURY
5.3
HyperX 3K
5.9
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive
HyperX FURY
6.3
HyperX 3K
6.9
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks
HyperX FURY
7.3
HyperX 3K
7.8
Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks
HyperX FURY
6.1
HyperX 3K
6.4
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Kingston HyperX FURY

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX FURY

Report a correction
Lower avg. power consumption 2.54 Watts vs 2.99 Watts More than 15% lower avg. power consumption
More capacity per dollar 2.67 GB/$ vs 1.88 GB/$ More than 40% more capacity per dollar
Thinner thickness 7 mm vs 10 mm More than 25% thinner thickness
Front view of Kingston HyperX 3K

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX 3K

Report a correction
Significantly faster 4k random write 109.63 MB/s vs 32.88 MB/s More than 3.2x faster 4k random write
Higher capacity 480 GB vs 120 GB 4x higher capacity
Much lower 4k random read access time 1.94 ms vs 8.07 ms 4.2x lower 4k random read access time
Faster 4k random read 128.52 MB/s vs 30.99 MB/s Around 4.2x faster 4k random read
Faster 512K sequential read 527.41 MB/s vs 260.03 MB/s More than 2x faster 512K sequential read
Much lower 4k random write access time 2.28 ms vs 7.6 ms 3.3x lower 4k random write access time
Faster windows 7 boot-up time 9.7 s vs 10.8 s More than 10% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Higher AS SSD score 758 pts vs 368 pts More than 2x higher AS SSD score
Significantly faster photoshop lens filter 56.3 s vs 63.2 s More than 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Higher PCMark vantage score 25,396 pts vs 21,542 pts Around 20% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 393.9 MB/s vs 162.03 MB/s Around 2.5x faster AS SSD ISO copy

Benchmarks Real world tests of HyperX FURY vs 3K

4K Random Read

HyperX FURY
30.99 MB/s
HyperX 3K
128.52 MB/s

4K Random Write

HyperX FURY
32.88 MB/s
HyperX 3K
109.63 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

HyperX FURY
10.8 s
HyperX 3K
9.7 s

Avg. Power Consumption

HyperX FURY
2.54 Watts
HyperX 3K
2.99 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

HyperX FURY
7.6 ms
HyperX 3K
2.28 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

HyperX FURY
8.07 ms
HyperX 3K
1.94 ms

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
IKnowIT (05:13 PM, March 7, 2015)
The HyperX 3K is so much better than the Fury, the site Admin or who for it need to declare winner the HyperX 3K because is really better, as your statistics says.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about

on the web

SSDBoss