SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of HyperX FURY vs BX200

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

BX200
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

BX200
6.3
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

BX200
8.1
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

BX200
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

SSDBoss Score

read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks

BX200
6.7

Winner
Crucial BX200 

SSDBoss recommends the Crucial BX200  based on its read performance, real world benchmarks and benchmarks.

See full details

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Kingston HyperX FURY

Reasons to consider the
Kingston HyperX FURY

Report a correction
Faster 512K sequential write 497.25 MB/s vs 400.17 MB/s Around 25% faster 512K sequential write
Front view of Crucial BX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX200

Report a correction
Significantly faster 4k random read 194.99 MB/s vs 30.99 MB/s More than 6.2x faster 4k random read
Much lower 4k random read access time 1.27 ms vs 8.07 ms 6.4x lower 4k random read access time
Faster 4k random write 63.61 MB/s vs 32.88 MB/s Around 95% faster 4k random write
Higher capacity 240 GB vs 120 GB 2x higher capacity
Significantly higher PCMark vantage score 30,018 pts vs 21,542 pts Around 40% higher PCMark vantage score
Much lower 4k random write access time 3.93 ms vs 7.6 ms Around 50% lower 4k random write access time
Significantly higher AS SSD score 987 pts vs 368 pts Around 2.8x higher AS SSD score
Much faster photoshop lens filter 54.2 s vs 63.2 s Around 15% faster photoshop lens filter
Faster 512K sequential read 363.24 MB/s vs 260.03 MB/s Around 40% faster 512K sequential read
Significantly faster AS SSD ISO copy 493.17 MB/s vs 162.03 MB/s More than 3x faster AS SSD ISO copy
Higher MTBF 1,500,000 hours vs 1,000,000 hours 50% higher MTBF
More capacity per dollar 3.43 GB/$ vs 2.67 GB/$ Around 30% more capacity per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of HyperX FURY vs BX200

4K Random Read

HyperX FURY
30.99 MB/s
BX200
194.99 MB/s

4K Random Write

HyperX FURY
32.88 MB/s
BX200
63.61 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

HyperX FURY
2.54 Watts
BX200
2.49 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

HyperX FURY
7.6 ms
BX200
3.93 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

HyperX FURY
8.07 ms
BX200
1.27 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus