Intel 520 vs 330 |
Released February, 2012
Intel 520
- 240 GB
- 2.5" SATA III
- 0 MB
7.4 Out of 10
by Tech Radar (Feb, 2012)Intel is also happy to 'fess up to the fact that the peak IOPS speed relates to a completely box-fresh drive.
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel 330
- 180 GB
- 2.5" SATA III
- 0 MB
6.9 Out of 10
by Tech Radar (Jul, 2012)The AS SSD read test result of 369MB/s isn't spectacular, either, but peak sequential performance is just part of the story.
SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 520 vs 330
read performance | |
How quickly data is read from the drive | |
| 4K Random Read | |
write performance | |
How quickly data is written to the drive | |
| 4K Random Write | |
real world benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs common tasks | |
| Windows 7 Boot-up Time and AS SSD ISO Copy | |
Benchmarks | |
How well the drive performs on common benchmarks | |
| Passmark Disk Rating, PCMark Vantage, AS SSD Score and 1 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly faster 4k random write | 81.39 MB/s | vs | 17.45 MB/s | Around 4.8x faster 4k random write | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much faster windows 7 boot-up time | 11.3 s | vs | 16 s | Around 30% faster windows 7 boot-up time | |||
| Slightly higher capacity | 240 GB | vs | 180 GB | Around 35% higher capacity | |||
| Significantly more capacity per dollar | 2 GB/$ | vs | 0.95 GB/$ | More than 2x more capacity per dollar | |||
| Faster AS SSD ISO copy | 262.98 MB/s | vs | 146.23 MB/s | Around 80% faster AS SSD ISO copy | |||
| Faster tom's storage bench application | 629 pts | vs | 524 pts | More than 20% faster tom's storage bench application | |||
| Higher passmark rating | 3,909 pts | vs | 3,408 pts | Around 15% higher passmark rating | |||
| Higher AS SSD score | 742 pts | vs | 665 pts | More than 10% higher AS SSD score | |||
| Faster sequential write | 520 MB/s | vs | 450 MB/s | More than 15% faster sequential write | |||
| Faster sequential read | 550 MB/s | vs | 500 MB/s | 10% faster sequential read | |||
| Faster random read | 50,000 IOPS | vs | 42,000 IOPS | Around 20% faster random read | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher PCMark vantage score | 65,878 pts | vs | 25,952 pts | More than 2.5x higher PCMark vantage score | |||
| Much lower avg. power consumption | 1.2 Watts | vs | 2.66 Watts | 2.2x lower avg. power consumption | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Intel 520 vs 330
4K Random Read
4K Random Write
Windows 7 Boot-up Time
Avg. Power Consumption
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $139 | $153 | |
| Intel 530 vs 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $440 | $153 | |
| Samsung 840 EVO vs Intel 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $310 | $153 | |
| Samsung 840 Pro vs Intel 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $49 | $153 | |
| Kingston SSDNow V300 vs Intel 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $153 | ||
| Samsung SSD 850 PRO vs Intel 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $139 | $153 | |
| Intel 335 vs 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $153 | ||
| Crucial M550 vs Intel 520 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| Crucial MX100 vs M550 | ||
| | VS | |
| $440 | $310 | |
| Samsung 840 EVO vs Pro | ||
| | VS | |
| $200 | $440 | |
| Crucial MX100 vs Samsung 840 EVO | ||
| | VS | |
| $440 | ||
| Samsung SSD 850 EVO vs 840 EVO | ||
| | VS | |
| $310 | ||
| Samsung SSD 850 PRO vs 840 Pro | ||
| | VS | |
| $440 | $49 | |
| Samsung 840 EVO vs Kingston SSDNow V300 | ||
| | VS | |
| $440 | ||
| Crucial M550 vs Samsung 840 EVO | ||
