SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of 335 vs 320

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Windows 7 Boot-up Time, Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

Passmark Disk Rating, PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

SSDBoss Score

read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and Benchmarks

Winner
Intel 335 

SSDBoss recommends the Intel 335  based on its read performance, write performance, real world benchmarks and benchmarks.

See full details

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel 335

Reasons to consider the
Intel 335

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 124.08 MB/s vs 62.7 MB/s Around 2x faster 4k random write
Significantly faster 512K sequential write 508.29 MB/s vs 195.32 MB/s More than 2.5x faster 512K sequential write
Faster windows 7 boot-up time 9.5 s vs 12.1 s More than 20% faster windows 7 boot-up time
Faster 512K sequential read 528.16 MB/s vs 220.68 MB/s Around 2.5x faster 512K sequential read
Much higher passmark rating 4,478 pts vs 1,392 pts Around 3.2x higher passmark rating
Higher capacity 180 GB vs 80 GB 2.2x higher capacity
Higher PCMark vantage score 26,266 pts vs 21,770 pts More than 20% higher PCMark vantage score
Higher AS SSD score 787 pts vs 395 pts Around 2x higher AS SSD score
Significantly lower 4k random write access time 2.02 ms vs 3.99 ms Around 50% lower 4k random write access time
Faster AS SSD ISO copy 417.95 MB/s vs 217.55 MB/s More than 90% faster AS SSD ISO copy
More capacity per dollar 1.5 GB/$ vs 0.57 GB/$ Around 2.8x more capacity per dollar
Front view of Intel 320

Reasons to consider the
Intel 320

Report a correction
Much lower avg. power consumption 1.55 Watts vs 2.95 Watts More than 45% lower avg. power consumption
Larger cache 64 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all SSDs, 64 MB cache is just OK
Lower 4k random read access time 1.87 ms vs 2.34 ms More than 20% lower 4k random read access time
Thinner thickness 7 mm vs 10 mm More than 25% thinner thickness

Benchmarks Real world tests of Intel 335 vs 320

4K Random Read

Intel 335
107.08 MB/s
Intel 320
133.91 MB/s

4K Random Write

Intel 335
124.08 MB/s
Intel 320
62.7 MB/s

Windows 7 Boot-up Time

Intel 335
9.5 s
Intel 320
12.1 s

Avg. Power Consumption

Intel 335
2.95 Watts
Intel 320
1.55 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

Intel 335
2.02 ms
Intel 320
3.99 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

Intel 335
2.34 ms
Intel 320
1.87 ms

Reviews Word on the street

Intel 335  vs 320 

6.0
7.0
So if you have a motherboard with SATA III, pick a drive that uses it instead to get your money's worth in terms of performance.
Intel 320

Comments

comments powered by Disqus