SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX500 vs MX200

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX500
6.6
MX200
6.1
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX500
6.8
MX200
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX500
8.3
MX200
8.1
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX500
6.9
MX200
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Crucial MX500

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX500

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 317.44 MB/s vs 169.96 MB/s More than 85% faster 4k random read
Faster 4k random write 105.31 MB/s vs 71.58 MB/s More than 45% faster 4k random write
Faster photoshop lens filter 49.4 s vs 53.9 s Around 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random read access time 0.79 ms vs 1.47 ms More than 45% lower 4k random read access time
Lower 4k random write access time 2.37 ms vs 3.49 ms More than 30% lower 4k random write access time
Front view of Crucial MX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX200

Report a correction
Lower avg. power consumption 2.03 Watts vs 2.32 Watts Around 15% lower avg. power consumption

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX500 vs MX200

4K Random Read

MX500
317.44 MB/s
MX200
169.96 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX500
105.31 MB/s
MX200
71.58 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX500
2.32 Watts
MX200
2.03 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX500
2.37 ms
MX200
3.49 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX500
0.79 ms
MX200
1.47 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus