SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX500 vs MX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX500
6.6
MX100
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX500
6.8
MX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX500
8.3
MX100
7.7
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX500
6.9
MX100
6.3
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Crucial MX500

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX500

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 317.44 MB/s vs 175.64 MB/s More than 80% faster 4k random read
Much higher PCMark vantage score 30,067 pts vs 16,976 pts More than 75% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster 4k random write 105.31 MB/s vs 72.86 MB/s Around 45% faster 4k random write
Much faster photoshop lens filter 49.4 s vs 64.2 s Around 25% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random read access time 0.79 ms vs 1.42 ms Around 45% lower 4k random read access time
Lower 4k random write access time 2.37 ms vs 3.43 ms More than 30% lower 4k random write access time
Front view of Crucial MX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX100

Report a correction

SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the MX100 vs the MX500.

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX500 vs MX100

4K Random Read

MX500
317.44 MB/s
MX100
175.64 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX500
105.31 MB/s
MX100
72.86 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX500
2.32 Watts
MX100
2.31 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX500
2.37 ms
MX100
3.43 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX500
0.79 ms
MX100
1.42 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus