SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX500 vs BX300

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX500
6.6
BX300
6.7
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX500
6.8
BX300
6.9
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX500
8.3
BX300
8.3
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX500
6.9
BX300
7.0
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Crucial MX500

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX500

Report a correction
Slightly lower avg. power consumption 2.32 Watts vs 2.42 Watts Around 5% lower avg. power consumption
Front view of Crucial BX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX300

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 128.88 MB/s vs 105.31 MB/s More than 20% faster 4k random write
Higher PCMark vantage score 32,177 pts vs 30,067 pts More than 5% higher PCMark vantage score
Lower 4k random write access time 1.94 ms vs 2.37 ms Around 20% lower 4k random write access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX500 vs BX300

4K Random Read

MX500
317.44 MB/s
BX300
340.62 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX500
105.31 MB/s
BX300
128.88 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX500
2.32 Watts
BX300
2.42 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX500
2.37 ms
BX300
1.94 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX500
0.79 ms
BX300
0.73 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus