SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX300 vs MX200

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX300
6.3
MX200
6.1
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX300
6.3
MX200
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX300
8.2
MX200
8.1
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX300
6.9
MX200
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Higher capacity 750 GB vs 500 GB 50% higher capacity
Faster 4k random read 244.23 MB/s vs 169.96 MB/s Around 45% faster 4k random read
Lower 4k random read access time 1.02 ms vs 1.47 ms More than 30% lower 4k random read access time
Faster photoshop lens filter 51.6 s vs 53.9 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Front view of Crucial MX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX200

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 71.58 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s Around 60% faster 4k random write
Significantly lower 4k random write access time 3.49 ms vs 5.56 ms More than 35% lower 4k random write access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX300 vs MX200

4K Random Read

MX300
244.23 MB/s
MX200
169.96 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX300
44.94 MB/s
MX200
71.58 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX300
1.92 Watts
MX200
2.03 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX300
5.56 ms
MX200
3.49 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX300
1.02 ms
MX200
1.47 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus