SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX300 vs MX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX300
6.3
MX100
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX300
6.3
MX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX300
8.2
MX100
7.7
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX300
6.9
MX100
6.3
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Higher capacity 750 GB vs 512 GB More than 45% higher capacity
Much higher PCMark vantage score 30,438 pts vs 16,976 pts Around 80% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster 4k random read 244.23 MB/s vs 175.64 MB/s Around 40% faster 4k random read
Much faster photoshop lens filter 51.6 s vs 64.2 s Around 20% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower avg. power consumption 1.92 Watts vs 2.31 Watts More than 15% lower avg. power consumption
Lower 4k random read access time 1.02 ms vs 1.42 ms Around 30% lower 4k random read access time
Front view of Crucial MX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX100

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 72.86 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s More than 60% faster 4k random write
Significantly lower 4k random write access time 3.43 ms vs 5.56 ms Around 40% lower 4k random write access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX300 vs MX100

4K Random Read

MX300
244.23 MB/s
MX100
175.64 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX300
44.94 MB/s
MX100
72.86 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX300
1.92 Watts
MX100
2.31 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX300
5.56 ms
MX100
3.43 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX300
1.02 ms
MX100
1.42 ms

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus