SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX300 vs BX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX300
6.3
BX100
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX300
6.3
BX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX300
8.2
BX100
8.4
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX300
6.9
BX100
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial MX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX300

Report a correction
Higher capacity 750 GB vs 500 GB 50% higher capacity
Faster 512K sequential write 477.46 MB/s vs 410.38 MB/s More than 15% faster 512K sequential write
Slightly higher AS SSD score 1,112 pts vs 965 pts More than 15% higher AS SSD score
Front view of Crucial BX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX100

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 80.74 MB/s vs 44.94 MB/s Around 80% faster 4k random write
Significantly lower 4k random write access time 3.1 ms vs 5.56 ms Around 45% lower 4k random write access time
Faster photoshop lens filter 49.4 s vs 51.6 s Around 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Slightly faster AS SSD ISO copy 504.4 MB/s vs 437.34 MB/s More than 15% faster AS SSD ISO copy

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX300 vs BX100

4K Random Read

MX300
244.23 MB/s
BX100
248.37 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX300
44.94 MB/s
BX100
80.74 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX300
1.92 Watts
BX100
1.94 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX300
5.56 ms
BX100
3.1 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX300
1.02 ms
BX100
1.01 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus