SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX200 vs MX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX200
6.1
MX100
6.0
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX200
6.5
MX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX200
8.1
MX100
7.7
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX200
6.8
MX100
6.3
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial MX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX200

Report a correction
Much higher PCMark vantage score 30,457 pts vs 16,976 pts Around 80% higher PCMark vantage score
Much faster photoshop lens filter 53.9 s vs 64.2 s More than 15% faster photoshop lens filter
Slightly faster 512K sequential read 532.68 MB/s vs 450.03 MB/s Around 20% faster 512K sequential read
More capacity per dollar 3.33 GB/$ vs 2.38 GB/$ Around 40% more capacity per dollar
Lighter 51 g vs 63 g Around 20% lighter
Lower avg. power consumption 2.03 Watts vs 2.31 Watts More than 10% lower avg. power consumption
Front view of Crucial MX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX100

Report a correction

SSDBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the MX100 vs the MX200.

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX200 vs MX100

4K Random Read

MX200
169.96 MB/s
MX100
175.64 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX200
71.58 MB/s
MX100
72.86 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX200
2.03 Watts
MX100
2.31 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX200
3.49 ms
MX100
3.43 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX200
1.47 ms
MX100
1.42 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus