SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX200 vs M550

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial MX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX200

Report a correction
Significantly higher capacity 500 GB vs 64 GB More than 7.8x higher capacity
Much higher PCMark vantage score 30,457 pts vs 19,156 pts Around 60% higher PCMark vantage score
Faster photoshop lens filter 53.9 s vs 57.2 s More than 5% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower avg. power consumption 2.03 Watts vs 2.35 Watts Around 15% lower avg. power consumption
Default view of Crucial M550

Reasons to consider the
Crucial M550

Report a correction
Slightly higher AS SSD score 1,156 pts vs 1,060 pts Around 10% higher AS SSD score

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX200 vs M550

4K Random Read

MX200
169.96 MB/s
Crucial M550
162.18 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX200
71.58 MB/s
Crucial M550
73.78 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX200
2.03 Watts
Crucial M550
2.35 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX200
3.49 ms
Crucial M550
3.39 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX200
1.47 ms
Crucial M550
1.54 ms

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus