SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of MX200 vs BX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

MX200
6.1
BX100
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

MX200
6.5
BX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

MX200
8.1
BX100
8.4
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

MX200
6.8
BX100
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial MX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial MX200

Report a correction
Faster 512K sequential write 482.13 MB/s vs 410.38 MB/s More than 15% faster 512K sequential write
Faster 512K sequential read 532.68 MB/s vs 436.93 MB/s More than 20% faster 512K sequential read
More capacity per dollar 3.33 GB/$ vs 2.94 GB/$ Around 15% more capacity per dollar
Front view of Crucial BX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX100

Report a correction
Faster 4k random read 248.37 MB/s vs 169.96 MB/s More than 45% faster 4k random read
Faster photoshop lens filter 49.4 s vs 53.9 s Around 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Lower 4k random read access time 1.01 ms vs 1.47 ms More than 30% lower 4k random read access time
Slightly lower 4k random write access time 3.1 ms vs 3.49 ms More than 10% lower 4k random write access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of MX200 vs BX100

4K Random Read

MX200
169.96 MB/s
BX100
248.37 MB/s

4K Random Write

MX200
71.58 MB/s
BX100
80.74 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

MX200
2.03 Watts
BX100
1.94 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

MX200
3.49 ms
BX100
3.1 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

MX200
1.47 ms
BX100
1.01 ms

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus