SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of BX300 vs BX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

BX300
6.7
BX100
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

BX300
6.9
BX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

BX300
8.3
BX100
8.4
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

BX300
7.0
BX100
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial BX300

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX300

Report a correction
Faster 4k random write 128.88 MB/s vs 80.74 MB/s Around 60% faster 4k random write
Faster 4k random read 340.62 MB/s vs 248.37 MB/s More than 35% faster 4k random read
Faster 512K sequential write 462.61 MB/s vs 410.38 MB/s Around 15% faster 512K sequential write
Higher AS SSD score 1,186 pts vs 965 pts Around 25% higher AS SSD score
Lower 4k random write access time 1.94 ms vs 3.1 ms More than 35% lower 4k random write access time
Lower 4k random read access time 0.73 ms vs 1.01 ms Around 30% lower 4k random read access time
Front view of Crucial BX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX100

Report a correction
Lower avg. power consumption 1.94 Watts vs 2.42 Watts Around 20% lower avg. power consumption

Benchmarks Real world tests of BX300 vs BX100

4K Random Read

BX300
340.62 MB/s
BX100
248.37 MB/s

4K Random Write

BX300
128.88 MB/s
BX100
80.74 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

BX300
2.42 Watts
BX100
1.94 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

BX300
1.94 ms
BX100
3.1 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

BX300
0.73 ms
BX100
1.01 ms

Comments

comments powered by Disqus