SSDBoss Review Our evaluation of BX200 vs BX100

read performance

How quickly data is read from the drive

BX200
6.0
BX100
6.3
4K Random Read, 4K Random Read Access Time and 512K Sequential Read

write performance

How quickly data is written to the drive

BX200
6.3
BX100
6.5
4K Random Write, 4K Random Write Access Time and 512K Sequential Write

real world benchmarks

How well the drive performs common tasks

BX200
8.1
BX100
8.4
Photoshop Lens Filter and AS SSD ISO Copy

Benchmarks

How well the drive performs on common benchmarks

BX200
6.8
BX100
6.8
PCMark Vantage and AS SSD Score

No winner declared

Too close to call

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Crucial BX200

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX200

Report a correction
More capacity per dollar 3.43 GB/$ vs 2.94 GB/$ More than 15% more capacity per dollar
Front view of Crucial BX100

Reasons to consider the
Crucial BX100

Report a correction
Higher capacity 500 GB vs 240 GB More than 2x higher capacity
Faster 4k random read 248.37 MB/s vs 194.99 MB/s More than 25% faster 4k random read
Faster 4k random write 80.74 MB/s vs 63.61 MB/s More than 25% faster 4k random write
Lower avg. power consumption 1.94 Watts vs 2.49 Watts More than 20% lower avg. power consumption
Faster photoshop lens filter 49.4 s vs 54.2 s Around 10% faster photoshop lens filter
Slightly faster 512K sequential read 436.93 MB/s vs 363.24 MB/s More than 20% faster 512K sequential read
Lower 4k random write access time 3.1 ms vs 3.93 ms More than 20% lower 4k random write access time
Slightly higher PCMark vantage score 31,363 pts vs 30,018 pts Around 5% higher PCMark vantage score
Lower 4k random read access time 1.01 ms vs 1.27 ms More than 20% lower 4k random read access time

Benchmarks Real world tests of BX200 vs BX100

4K Random Read

BX200
194.99 MB/s
BX100
248.37 MB/s

4K Random Write

BX200
63.61 MB/s
BX100
80.74 MB/s

Avg. Power Consumption

BX200
2.49 Watts
BX100
1.94 Watts

4K Random Read Access Time

BX200
3.93 ms
BX100
3.1 ms

4K Random Write Access Time

BX200
1.27 ms
BX100
1.01 ms

Reviews Word on the street

BX200  vs BX100 

8.9
9.7
Personally, I would still buy the MX100 because its price is just too good, and saving $5 on the 250 GB variant really is not worth it deviating from the nearly perfect MX100.
BX100

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus